Higher Competitiveness of Exports, More Anti-dumping Lawsuits

1:38:32 PM | 3/21/2006

Vietnam has faced 25 trade lawsuits so far, including 21 anti-dumping lawsuits and four self-defense lawsuits against Vietnamese exports. With the annual export growth of nearly 20 per cent in recent years, and more trade lawsuits for Vietnam’s key export items such as seafood, bicycles and footwear in the large markets of the EU and the US, Vietnam has become a new wave in international trade exchanges and the lawsuits are clear evidence of the higher competitiveness of the country’s products.
 
However, the increasing number of such anti-dumping lawsuits will seriously affect export growth plans and competitiveness Vietnamese enterprise in the international agenda. Besides, the remedies will create bad impacts on social issues such as jobs and income for labourers.
 
The number of anti-dumping surveys for Vietnam’s export items has sharply increased in recent years. Vietnam faced only one or two cases per year from1994-2001, but three case in 2003, seven in 2004 and three in 2005, involving many products such as bicycle parts, stainless steel door latches and pins, fluorescent lamps, shrimp, rubber tyres and inner tubes of motorbikes and bicycles among others. Among 18 finished trade remedies, Vietnam won only six cases.   
 
From the real situations of these anti-dumping lawsuits over the past three years, especially the EU’s lawsuit against Vietnam’s shoes with leather uppers in July 2005, Egypt’s lawsuit against fluorescent lamps in December 2005, and Argentina’s lawsuit against bicycle and motorbike spokes, the newly-established Competitiveness Management Department under Trade Ministry analyses: “In the beginning pf the period, Vietnam’s exports that were imposed with anti-dumping taxes were not strategic exports and had low export value, such as seasoning, lighters, and garlic, and therefore, did not create a big impact on the country’s export plan. This is attributed to the fact that Vietnamese enterprises have not paid special attention to the dumping issue.” 
 
According to the Competitiveness Management Department, the anti-dumping lawsuits on catfish (tra and basa) in 2002, on shrimps in 2003 and on shoes with leather uppers in 2005 showed that Vietnam’s key exports have been taken into consideration by rivals that produce the same products in some foreign markets.

The EU’s anti-dumping case on Vietnamese shoes is a serious lawsuit because footwear is one of Vietnam’s key exports in a major export market of Vietnam, remarked the department. According to Ms. Dinh Thi My Loan, Head of the Trade Ministry's Department of Competition Control, the EC’s announcement on temporary taxes, 4.2 per cent from July 2006 to 16.8 per cent from September 2006, will result in negative impacts on Vietnam’s social and economic development in general and its leather and footwear industry in particular that is regarded as one of Vietnam’s major foreign currency earners attracting more than 500,000 labourers.
 
The trade remedies are the first severe hardships Vietnam has faced since the beginning of opening up its economy but they have also brought valuable experience for the whole business community and associations of products in general as well as specific management agencies in particularly. Together with strengthening international integration and speeding up production of export items, more trade remedies, including anti-dumping lawsuits, will certainly appear, they may even come from fellow trading countries, not only from developed countries, stressed the department.
 
List of Vietnam’s export items in facing anti-dumping lawsuits in 1994-2005
 
No.
Year
Products
Prosecutor
Results
1
1994
Rice
Colombia
No anti-dumping tax was levied, dumping at 9.07% but no damage for rice cultivation in Columbia   
2
1998
Seasoning
EU
Anti-dumping tax of 16.8%
3
1998
Footwear
EU
No anti-dumping tax because added market share was small compared to China, Indonesia and Thailand
4
2000
Gas lighters
Poland
Anti-dumping tax at 0.09 euro/unit
5
2001
Garlic
Canada
Anti-dumping tax at 1.48 dollar Canada/kg
6
2002
Shoes and non-absorbent soles
Canada
No anti-dumping tax because soles imported from Vietnam did not harm Canada’s shoe industry
7
2002
Lighters
Korea
The lawsuit was suspended because Korea’s industrial sector withdraw its complaint
8
2002
Lighters
EU
The lawsuit was suspended because Korea’s industrial sector withdraw its complaint
9
2002
Tra and basa fishes (catfish)
US
Anti-dumping tax of around 36.84-63.88%
10
2003
Oxyde zinc
EU
Anti-dumping tax of 93%
11
2003
Ring binders
EU
Ring binders categorised 17–23 were levied about 325 euro for every thousand binders, an increase of 78.8% in the tax
12
2003
Shrimps
US
Anti-dumping tax of around 4.3-25.76%
13
2004
Bicycle and motorbike tyres and inner tubes
Turkey
Anti-dumping taxes of 30% for 2.25-17 inch motorbike tyres; 44% for 2.25-17 inch motorbike inner tubes; 29% for bicycle tyres; and 49% for bicycle inner tubes
14
2004
Bicycles
EU
Anti-dumping taxes of 15.8-34.5%
15
2004
Pipes, steel tubes
EU
No application of any anti-dumping measures
16
2004
stainless steel door fasteners
EU
Anti-dumping tax of 7%
17
2004
Florescent lamps (CFL-i)
EU
Anti-dumping tax of 66.1%
18
2004
Surfboards
Peru
Anti-dumping tax at US$5.2/unit
19
2005
Shoes with leather uppers
EU
Under investigation
20
2005
Florescent lamps
Egypt
Under investigation
21
2005
Bicycle spokes
Argentina
Under investigation
 
(Source: The Trade Ministry’s Department for Competition Control)  
 
The Quan